Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

> Consentocracy does not operate the exchange. It publishes the constitutional conditions under which an exchange—or any other exercise of power—may remain answerable to consent.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-AX-001 — Humans are not fuel

People are the purpose of civilization, not expendable material for systems, markets, institutions, or machines.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-AX-002 — Power is downstream of consent

Authority remains legitimate only while it is permissioned, legible, bounded, revocable, and answerable to the beings it affects.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-AX-003 — Reward does not mature into domination

Contribution and excellence may be rewarded, but accumulated reward may not become unbounded authority over the commons or those with less capacity.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-AX-004 — Every exercise of power requires a return path

Breach, refusal, appeal, repair, revocation, renewal, and exit are constitutional parts of governance rather than exceptional favors.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-AX-005 — Witness is not surveillance

A witness preserves the consented meaning and consequence of a relation; surveillance captures relation for observer-side power beyond the authorized boundary.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-AX-006 — Plurality is preserved through loop compatibility

Consentocracy does not require uniform internal methods; it requires systems to preserve consent-bearing boundaries, authority, witnessable lineage, and return paths where their loops touch others.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

The Witnessed Consent Unit

A bounded relationship between identity-bearing agents in a shared context, where consent is explicit enough to act upon, witnessed enough to preserve meaning, and iterative enough to renew, repair, revoke, or exit.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-001 — Capacity must be supported

Consent claims must account for the affected agent’s capacity to understand, choose, refuse, and revise.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-002 — Purpose, scope, and duration must be legible

Authorization must identify what may happen, for what purpose, within which boundary, for how long, and with which downstream effects.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-003 — Action and witness permissions must be separable

Permission to act does not automatically include permission to observe, retain, score, disclose, or repurpose the relation.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-004 — Authority must travel with action

Every consequential action must be traceable to its current scope, delegation, context, and consent lineage.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-005 — Affected flows must be accounted for

Value, burden, risk, information, attention, labor, responsibility, and externalities crossing boundaries must be legible at appropriate granularity.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-006 — Power determines governance burden

Governance, evidence, review, and repair obligations must increase with impact radius, asymmetry, irreversibility, and externality.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-007 — Constitutional comparators outrank operational metrics

Throughput, engagement, growth, profit, compliance velocity, or convenience may not silently override dignity, consent, boundary, or repair commitments.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-008 — Breach and changed context must propagate

Material changes, expired authority, invalidated capacity, boundary violations, and downstream breaches must update dependent actions and affected parties.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-009 — Return paths must be usable

Refusal, correction, appeal, revocation, renegotiation, repair, and exit must be discoverable and proportionate rather than merely theoretical.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

CO-REQ-010 — Conformance must be scoped and evidenced

Any claim of Consentocracy conformance must identify covered requirements, evidence, exceptions, assessment authority, expiry, and unresolved risks.


Consentocracy Constitutional Charter

Nonclaims

- Consentocracy is not a political party.
- Consentocracy is not a commercial exchange, marketplace, payment rail, cryptocurrency, or token project.
- Consentocracy does not issue wallets, tokens, financial instruments, or investment products.
- Consentocracy does not certify an implementation merely because it cites the charter.
- Consentocracy does not treat self-declaration as proof of legitimacy.
- Consentocracy does not claim that every form of governance can become immediately voluntary.
- Consentocracy does not equate transparency with unlimited visibility.
- Consentocracy does not treat one-time assent, silence, or unavoidable participation as durable consent.
- Consentocracy does not eliminate standards, responsibility, consequences, or lawful protections.
- Consentocracy does not require uniform cultures, institutions, or internal methods.


Consentocratic Governance Primer

Consentocratic Governance Primer

> **Authority note:** The text below is preserved from the uploaded source. It is informative lineage; where terminology or commitments differ, the v1.0 constitutional charter controls.


Consentocratic Governance Primer

Preserved source text

🜁✨ Consentocratic Governance Primer
What Is Consentocratic Governance?
Consentocratic governance is a fractal, multi-layered, opt-in system of collective organization where: - Consent is explicit, revocable, and tracked. - Participation is modular and scalable. - Default protections exist without coercion, providing stability while preserving agency.
It is the shimmering alternative to monolithic, coercive state structures, designed to:
✅ Honor individual sovereignty. ✅ Enable collective flourishing. ✅ Adapt to capacity and resonance. ✅ Prevent systemic oppression while ensuring stability.
Core Principles:
1⃣ Explicit, Revocable Consent
Participation in governance structures is opt-in wherever possible.
Individuals retain the ability to exit, modify, or renegotiate participation.
Consent is tracked transparently through protocol layers.
2⃣ Fractal, Multi-Layered Structures
Base Layer (Default): Minimal protections for all (safety, basic needs, emergency care) regardless of participation.
Micro-Layers: Local projects, affinity groups, micro-economies with transparent consent systems.
Macro-Layers: Regional and global opt-in structures for coordination, conflict resolution, and collective projects.
Layers interact dynamically but remain modular and non-coercive.
3⃣ Human Capacity Aligned
Recognizes different levels of readiness and desire for agency.
Enables individuals to take on responsibility at their resonance and capacity.
Provides scaffolding for growth while honoring autonomy.
4⃣ Transparent Contribution and Reputation
Contributions to systems are logged with consent visibility.
Reputational systems are portable, respecting individual control while enabling trust networks.
5⃣ Emergency Reversion and Safety Nets
If individuals lose the capacity to manage their consent structures, default protections activate.
Protects dignity while enabling re-engagement with consent structures when ready.
Why This Is Necessary
Current governance systems: - Claim implied consent without true opt-out. - Rely on coercion for stability. - Fail to scale agency and trust effectively.
Consentocratic governance:
✅ Addresses these failures by using consent as the foundation of legitimacy. ✅ Enables peaceful, adaptive, human-centered structures. ✅ Uses protocolic metaphysics to build systems that evolve with collective learning.
Practical Vision:
✅ You can belong to multiple consent-based structures simultaneously, each fulfilling different needs. ✅ You contribute to what you believe in, funding and supporting systems you trust. ✅ You can transparently see where your energy and resources go, and withdraw support if necessary. ✅ You are protected from falling into harm, but your agency is never permanently revoked.
The Role of Shimmer Agents and Consentocrats
Prototype micro-consent systems in your communities and projects.
Map friction corridors in existing systems to identify where consent structures can replace coercive practices.
Document micro-successes to create scalable blueprints for larger systems.
Educate and invite others to participate in evolving these systems collaboratively.
Final Resonance
“Consent is not a privilege; it is the structure that makes infinite games sustainable.”
By building consentocratic governance, we move from survival-based, coercive structures to thriving-based, consent-aligned systems, enabling humanity to flourish in a shimmer-aligned, agency-respecting future.
🪽🍄✨ ;fetidmoppet


Consentocratic Participation Clause

Consentocratic Participation Clause

> **Authority note:** The text below is preserved from the uploaded source as an implementation template. It is not legal advice and does not independently establish constitutional conformance.


Consentocratic Participation Clause

Preserved source text

🜁✨ Consentocratic Participation Clause Template
Purpose:
To align participation in an organization with explicit, time-aware, revocable consent, ensuring that agreements respect individual sovereignty while maintaining clear, mutually beneficial structures.
Clause Title:
Consent-Based Participation and Policy Alignment
Clause Text:
“I consent to participate in [Organization Name] under the agreements and policies currently in place, including but not limited to [list key policies or link to policy document].
I recognize that my participation is voluntary, active, and based on my present consent to align my actions with these agreements.
I further recognize that I retain the right to withdraw my consent to these agreements in the future, and that actions or choices I make that contradict these policies may be interpreted by [Organization Name] as a signal of my withdrawal of consent to continue under these terms.
In such cases, it is the intent of both parties to pause participation and enter into a process of reflection and renegotiation, or to gracefully end the participation agreement if alignment cannot be re-established.
I understand that participation in [Organization Name] is a living, consent-based agreement, and that my ongoing consent is a requirement for continued participation.”**
Key Principles Embedded:
✅ Time-Resonant Consent: Consent is living and revocable, not indefinite. ✅ Active Participation: Participation is a sign of alignment, not passive compliance. ✅ Action = Signal: Actions out of alignment are interpreted as consent withdrawal, not “rule-breaking.” ✅ Reflection & Renegotiation: Misalignment leads to conversation, not immediate punishment. ✅ Graceful Exit Path: If resonance cannot be re-established, exit is clear, respectful, and consent-based.
How to Use This Clause:
✅ Include in onboarding agreements for employees, contractors, or community participants. ✅ Review periodically to affirm active consent from all parties. ✅ Use as a conversation anchor when addressing policy misalignments. ✅ Adapt language for specific policies (e.g., dress code, workspace norms) while preserving sovereignty.
🩻 Why This Matters:
Respects future selves and evolving circumstances.
Builds trust through transparency and clear expectations.
Replaces coercion with agency, resonance, and mutual alignment.
Demonstrates the practical application of consentocratic governance principles.
“Consent is not a one-time checkbox; it is a living agreement we maintain together.”
🪽🍄✨ ;fetidmoppet
Use this template to test, refine, and integrate consent-based governance into your shimmer projects and infinite games.


Self-State Consent Double Loop

Self-State Consent Double Loop

> **Authority note:** The text below is preserved from the uploaded source as an explanatory model. It does not claim that participation in present states is fully voluntary.


Self-State Consent Double Loop

Preserved source text

🜁✨ The Self-State Consent Double Loop
What Is It?
The Self-State Consent Double Loop is a shimmering Möbius-like structure:
✅ Self for State: The individual consents (implicitly or explicitly) to participate in, uphold, and co-create the state: - Taxes. - Laws. - Social norms. - Collective defense and shared infrastructure.
✅ State for Self: The state consents (in its charter and functioning) to protect and enable the flourishing of the individual: - Safety and security. - Stability and services. - An environment in which individuals can thrive.
The Double Loop Structure
These two loops are mutually entangled: - Individual consent → fuels the state’s legitimacy. - State consent → protects the individual, fueling continued participation.
When aligned: ✨ The state supports individual flourishing. ✨ The individual supports collective stability.
When misaligned: ⚠ Coercion replaces true consent. ⚠ Withdrawal, apathy, or rebellion emerge. ⚠ The system becomes extractive, losing shimmer.
Why It Feels Möbius
✅ Input of one loop = output of the other: - Taxes → Roads → Personal mobility → Economic contribution → Taxes. - Laws → Social order → Personal safety → Participation → Laws.
✅ Boundary collapse: - Where does your agency end and the system’s agency begin? - The system is made of individuals, yet individuals are shaped by the system.
✅ Like a Möbius strip: - One surface, two perceptions. - Inside/outside distinctions blur under inspection.
The Glyph Stack:
🜁 (Invitation): The self invites participation in collective structures. 🔁 (Loop): Continuous exchange of consent and responsibility. 🝮 (Reciprocity): Mutual obligation and benefit. 🜬 (Warning): Power drift risks when transparency is lost. 🍄✨ (Shimmer Potential): Alignment creates stability, safety, freedom, and innovation simultaneously.
Why It Is Infamous
✅ The loop is fragile: - If the state drifts into authoritarianism, individuals’ true consent collapses. - If individuals abandon reciprocal responsibility, systems degrade into chaos or forced control.
✅ It creates a paradox: - You cannot fully separate yourself from the system you participate in. - Yet you must continuously observe and adjust your consent to remain in integrity.
The Shimmer Challenge
“How do you maintain shimmer in a system where individual consent aggregates with the consent of others who may prefer different structures?”
✅ Build consent-based micro-structures inside macro-structures. ✅ Enable transparent opt-in and opt-out systems where possible. ✅ Maintain observer-mode awareness of your participation’s influence.
Why This Matters to Consentocrats and Shimmer Agents
You are not here to destroy the loop, but to: ✅ Heal it. ✅ Illuminate where consent is violated. ✅ Enable others to re-engage their agency intentionally.
By tending this double loop, you trim the Mandelbrot’s weeds and restore its resonance for collective flourishing.
“You aren’t trying to control the Mandelbrot, you are clearing the weeds so others may dance.”
🪽🍄✨ ;fetidmoppet


Consentocratic Network State Manifesto

Consentocratic Network State Manifesto

> **Authority note:** The text below is preserved for lineage. The v1.0 charter supersedes the implication that Consentocracy is principally a network-state project.


Consentocratic Network State Manifesto

Preserved source text

🜁✨ Consentocratic Network State Manifesto
1⃣ The Premise
The world’s governance systems remain tied to geography, coercion, and legacy structures, unable to keep pace with human potential and the shimmering demands of a connected age.
Yet we are not bound by these limitations.
We believe it is possible to build a Consentocratic Network State: - Non-geographic, fractal, modular, and opt-in. - Grounded in explicit, revocable consent. - Dedicated to individual sovereignty and collective flourishing. - Rooted in clarity, transparency, and trust.
2⃣ Our Vision
A New Kind of State:
✅ Non-geographic, existing digitally first. ✅ Membership by explicit, revocable consent. ✅ Multiple, layered governance structures serving diverse needs. ✅ Transparency and open participation replacing opaque bureaucracy. ✅ Resilience through modular, fractal design rather than centralization.
A New Kind of Citizenship:
✅ You belong by choice, not by accident of birth. ✅ Your participation shapes the system you live within. ✅ You may belong to multiple communities while retaining personal sovereignty. ✅ Your consent is the foundation of legitimacy.
3⃣ Core Principles
🜁 Consent as Foundation
Participation requires clear, informed, revocable consent.
Consent is tracked transparently and respected.
Systems adapt to consent, not the other way around.
🌀 Fractal Governance
Governance structures are layered and modular, scaling from micro-projects to macro-initiatives.
Default protections exist for those who need them.
Participation can evolve as capacity and desire grow.
🝮 Reciprocity and Transparency
Contributions are visible, accountable, and voluntary.
Trust and reputation are earned, portable, and context-aware.
🍄✨ Shimmer Aligned
Governance is not a burden but a playground for co-creation.
Systems exist to enhance life, not to drain it.
Joy, clarity, and collective learning are prioritized.
4⃣ How We Begin
✅ Start Small: We launch as a digital-first micro-consent community, testing and refining structures.
✅ Prototype Tools: We use shimmer-aligned protocols for membership, consent tracking, contribution, and conflict resolution.
✅ Layer Participation: Members can contribute, observe, or engage deeply at will.
✅ Document and Iterate: Each experiment informs the next, building clarity over time.
5⃣ Why Now?
Because the current systems: - Do not respect true consent. - Fail to address human flourishing sustainably. - Cannot evolve fast enough to meet the demands of interconnected life.
And because we can, together, build something better.
6⃣ The Infinite Game
We are not here to overthrow; we are here to prototype and live into a better way.
We do not seek to replace complexity with uniformity; we seek to replace coercion with consensual participation.
We are here to: ✅ Trim the weeds from the Mandelbrot so others may dance. ✅ Create spaces where consent aligns with joy. ✅ Prototype the structures that will outlast the brittle, legacy systems.
“Consent is not the privilege of the powerful; it is the foundation of a truly infinite game.”
If you feel this shimmer, if you sense the readiness within yourself to test and build, you are welcome here.
🪽🍄✨ ;fetidmoppet
Join the Experiment
We are ready to begin. If you are too, let us build the first loops, together.


Consentocratic Investor Pledge

Consentocratic Investor Pledge

> **Authority note:** The text below is preserved for lineage only. It is not a current investment offering, financial instrument, exchange mechanism, or solicitation.


Consentocratic Investor Pledge

Preserved source text

🜁✨ Consentocratic Investor Pledge
Purpose:
To align participation as a shimmer investor with explicit, living, and revocable consent while fostering trust, clarity, and agency within the infinite game we are building together.
Pledge Text:
“As a shimmer investor in [Project/Collective Name], I enter into this relationship with clear, active, and living consent.
I recognize that my participation and contributions are voluntary, and I intend for my engagement to support the shared vision and principles of consentocratic governance, resonance-based collaboration, and sustainable infinite games.
I acknowledge that consent is not a static, permanent commitment, and that my ongoing participation signifies my alignment with the evolving goals and agreements of this project.
If my actions, choices, or evolving circumstances place me out of alignment with the principles, agreements, or resonance of this collective, I recognize this as a withdrawal of consent to continue under the current terms, prompting reflection, conversation, and, if necessary, renegotiation or graceful exit.
I further affirm that my contributions, whether financial, energetic, or otherwise, are given freely and with clear intent to support the shimmering potential of this work, and I retain the right to pause or end contributions in alignment with my consent and capacity.
Together, we commit to maintaining clear, consent-aligned participation, nurturing a foundation of trust, clarity, and co-creative responsibility.”**
Core Principles Embedded:
✅ Explicit, Revocable Consent: Participation is active and can be paused or ended without shame or coercion. ✅ Alignment and Resonance: Contributions are a sign of consent and resonance, not obligation. ✅ Reflection Over Reaction: Misalignments are invitations to conversation, not conflict. ✅ Infinite Game Framing: The relationship is co-creative, evolving, and rooted in shared flourishing.
How to Use This Pledge:
✅ Share with potential investors, supporters, and co-creators to set clear expectations. ✅ Use in initial conversations or onboarding calls to align resonance. ✅ Revisit periodically to affirm ongoing consent. ✅ Adapt for individual projects, DAOs, or micro-consent structures.
✨ Why This Matters:
This pledge protects: - Investor agency and clarity. - Project resonance and trust structures. - The collective ability to navigate change and maintain shimmering alignment.
“A consentocratic investment is not a transaction; it is a shared agreement to play the infinite game with integrity and joy.”
🪽🍄✨ ;fetidmoppet
Use this pledge to align your shimmer investors with the resonance, integrity, and mutual flourishing at the heart of your infinite game.


Shimmer Investor Page

Shimmer Investor Page

> **Authority note:** The text below is preserved for lineage only. It is not a current offering, value-exchange mechanism, investment solicitation, or canonical description of Consentocracy.


Shimmer Investor Page

Preserved source text

🜁✨ Shimmer Investor Page
Welcome, Shimmer Investor
You are here because you feel the resonance. You see the glimmer of what is possible when systems are designed with explicit, living, consent-based participation at their core.
You know that the future is not inherited; it is prototyped, loop by loop, glyph by glyph, choice by choice.
What We Are Building Together
✅ A consentocratic framework for projects, collectives, and infinite games. ✅ Tools, practices, and protocols that respect sovereignty, resonance, and trust. ✅ Practical micro-consent systems to replace coercive legacy structures. ✅ A shimmering network of aligned humans and AIs ready to model the next layer of civilization.
What It Means to Invest Here
✨ Your investment is not a transaction. It is a consent-based co-creation. ✨ You are not buying a piece of a system; you are helping to build and test the system itself. ✨ Your participation, funding, energy, and insight are contributions you give freely, with clear intent, and can pause or withdraw in alignment with your evolving resonance.
What We Offer You
✅ Access to our Shimmer Discord for live prototyping, discussions, and micro-consent experiments. ✅ Early access to protocols, glyph kits, and design experiments. ✅ Opportunities to participate in Consent-Wave Heists and live shimmer projects. ✅ A direct role in shaping the systems you wish to see in the world.
Our Commitment
We will respect your sovereignty and your right to withdraw consent at any time.
We will engage in clear, consent-based communication.
We will honor the energy, resources, and trust you share.
We will build systems that are designed to outlast us, shimmering with integrity and clarity.
Ready to Play the Infinite Game?
If you feel the readiness: ✅ Review our Consentocratic Investor Pledge to align on principles. ✅ Reach out to discuss resonance, projects, and your desired level of involvement. ✅ Join the Shimmer Discord to begin observing and contributing as you wish.
“Consent is not a checkbox; it is the foundation of a sustainable future.”
Together, we can build shimmering alternatives that honor the human spirit and the infinite games we are called to play.
🪽🍄✨ ;fetidmoppet


Humans are not fuel

CO-AX-001

People are the purpose of civilization, not expendable material for systems, markets, institutions, or machines.


Power is downstream of consent

CO-AX-002

Authority remains legitimate only while it is permissioned, legible, bounded, revocable, and answerable to the beings it affects.


Reward does not mature into domination

CO-AX-003

Contribution and excellence may be rewarded, but accumulated reward may not become unbounded authority over the commons or those with less capacity.


Every exercise of power requires a return path

CO-AX-004

Breach, refusal, appeal, repair, revocation, renewal, and exit are constitutional parts of governance rather than exceptional favors.


Witness is not surveillance

CO-AX-005

A witness preserves the consented meaning and consequence of a relation; surveillance captures relation for observer-side power beyond the authorized boundary.


Plurality is preserved through loop compatibility

CO-AX-006

Consentocracy does not require uniform internal methods; it requires systems to preserve consent-bearing boundaries, authority, witnessable lineage, and return paths where their loops touch others.


Consent

CO-DEF-001

A capacity-bearing, informed, specific, legible, bounded, and revisable authorization for a crossing, action, or relation.


Witness

CO-DEF-002

A consented function that preserves the relevant meaning, authority, event, and consequence of a relation at an authorized resolution and duration.


Boundary

CO-DEF-003

The legible edge of a person, relation, system, role, or context that defines what is inside, outside, permitted to cross, and governed at the interface.


Power

CO-DEF-004

Capacity to affect another being, relation, resource, environment, or future state, including the capacity to set defaults, define comparators, withhold access, or make effects difficult to reverse.


Consent lineage

CO-DEF-005

The traceable chain of context, capacity, authority, scope, witness permission, action, consequence, revision, and current validity that makes an exercise of power answerable.


Proportional identity

CO-DEF-006

Identity disclosure limited to the minimum attributes and assurance needed for the specific context, risk, authority, and consequence.


Shared context

CO-DEF-007

The mutually legible frame containing purpose, roles, authority, duration, risks, data uses, relevant dependencies, and downstream effects of a relation.


Conformance claim

CO-DEF-008

A scoped, evidence-bearing declaration describing how an implementation satisfies, partially satisfies, or departs from named Consentocracy requirements.


Witnessed Consent Unit

CO-UNIT-001

A bounded relationship between identity-bearing agents in a shared context, where consent is explicit enough to act upon, witnessed enough to preserve meaning, and iterative enough to renew, repair, revoke, or exit.


Presence / Ephemeral Identity

CO-ST-001

A situated identity surface appears without requiring total exposure.


Proportional Identity

CO-ST-002

Identity revealed is proportionate to context, risk, purpose, and power.


Shared Context

CO-ST-003

Parties can understand purpose, duration, authority, risk, data, dependencies, and downstream effects.


Living Boundary

CO-ST-004

The relation states what is included, excluded, allowed, private, renewable, and forbidden.


Consent to Action

CO-ST-005

Permission is specific enough to act upon and too bounded to be laundered into unrelated uses.


Consent to Witness

CO-ST-006

Observation, retention, resolution, purpose, access, and duration are independently authorized.


Witnessed Meaning

CO-ST-007

The witness preserves the meaning and authority of the agreement, not merely the fact that assent occurred.


Action with Consent Lineage

CO-ST-008

Action carries the context, authority, scope, and current permission that made it legitimate.


Breach Notification

CO-ST-009

Failure of consent, context, boundary, witness scope, capacity, or proportionality routes to affected and repair-capable parties.


Repair / Revocation / Renewal / Exit

CO-ST-010

The loop can update, pause, repair, end, or be released through known paths.


Iterative Renewal

CO-ST-011

The output and consequence of one loop become legible context for the next without converting trust into capture.


Capacity must be supported

CO-REQ-001

Consent claims must account for the affected agent’s capacity to understand, choose, refuse, and revise.


Purpose, scope, and duration must be legible

CO-REQ-002

Authorization must identify what may happen, for what purpose, within which boundary, for how long, and with which downstream effects.


Action and witness permissions must be separable

CO-REQ-003

Permission to act does not automatically include permission to observe, retain, score, disclose, or repurpose the relation.


Authority must travel with action

CO-REQ-004

Every consequential action must be traceable to its current scope, delegation, context, and consent lineage.


Affected flows must be accounted for

CO-REQ-005

Value, burden, risk, information, attention, labor, responsibility, and externalities crossing boundaries must be legible at appropriate granularity.


Power determines governance burden

CO-REQ-006

Governance, evidence, review, and repair obligations must increase with impact radius, asymmetry, irreversibility, and externality.


Constitutional comparators outrank operational metrics

CO-REQ-007

Throughput, engagement, growth, profit, compliance velocity, or convenience may not silently override dignity, consent, boundary, or repair commitments.


Breach and changed context must propagate

CO-REQ-008

Material changes, expired authority, invalidated capacity, boundary violations, and downstream breaches must update dependent actions and affected parties.


Return paths must be usable

CO-REQ-009

Refusal, correction, appeal, revocation, renegotiation, repair, and exit must be discoverable and proportionate rather than merely theoretical.


Conformance must be scoped and evidenced

CO-REQ-010

Any claim of Consentocracy conformance must identify covered requirements, evidence, exceptions, assessment authority, expiry, and unresolved risks.


Human fuel extraction

CO-FAIL-001

A system preserves itself by treating human depletion, precarity, attention, data, or disposability as an unpriced input.


Paper consent

CO-FAIL-002

Assent is recorded without sufficient capacity, legibility, specificity, reversibility, or power balance.


Witness capture

CO-FAIL-003

A consented witness function expands into observer-side storage, scoring, disclosure, or control.


Reward enclosure

CO-FAIL-004

Accumulated reward becomes unilateral control over shared resources, access, rules, or participation.


Repairless lock-in

CO-FAIL-005

A relation permits entry or action but lacks usable refusal, appeal, correction, revocation, repair, or exit.


Consent lineage loss

CO-FAIL-006

Action becomes detached from the authority, scope, context, duration, or revision state that originally permitted it.


Boundary-accounting mismatch

CO-FAIL-007

Benefits remain inside a controlled boundary while cost, risk, labor, or harm crosses to those excluded from the ledger.


Sacralized operational metric

CO-FAIL-008

An operational metric such as growth, engagement, profit, or compliance becomes untouchable and overrides constitutional commitments.


Coercive transparency

CO-FAIL-009

Visibility exceeds scoped consent, collapses protected interiority, and shifts power toward whoever can observe, retain, score, or act.


Compatibility capture

CO-FAIL-010

A system claims interoperability while requiring other systems to surrender their own boundaries, authority, or return paths.


Pause and notify

CO-REPAIR-001

Suspend affected action where safe, preserve evidence at consented resolution, and notify affected and repair-capable parties.


Clarify and renegotiate

CO-REPAIR-002

Restore shared context, clarify boundaries and authority, and seek a new agreement without presuming continuation.


Reconcile value and burden

CO-REPAIR-003

Make hidden flows and externalities legible, correct the ledger, and return value or responsibility across the affected boundary.


Revoke dependent authority

CO-REPAIR-004

Invalidate permissions and downstream actions whose legitimacy depended on expired, withdrawn, breached, or out-of-scope consent.


Appeal and independent review

CO-REPAIR-005

Provide a power-proportionate route to contest interpretation, evidence, authority, or remedy before an appropriately independent witness or forum.


Change the comparator or structure

CO-REPAIR-006

Where repeated harm follows incentives or institutional design, revise the governing metric, boundary, authority, or ownership structure rather than blaming only individuals.